PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140409 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 11 '21 at 23:41 |
Run Duration | 185 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3962) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 355.60
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 171 154 152 147 142 MB/s
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)-$149
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 165 168 169 167 168 MB/s
|
99.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
712GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 37 42 39 38 34 MB/s
|
16.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 9 8.4 9 9 9 MB/s
|
5.14%
Terrible
|
|||
WD easystore 2647 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 103 102 102 102 MB/s
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 426x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 389x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 203x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 67x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $334 |