Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Memory 13.8 1-Core 33.8 2-Core 55.8 19% 34.5 Pts	4-Core 53.3 8-Core 57.5 7% 55.4 Pts	64-Core 62.1 4% 62.1 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4982 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.2 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NT-128 128GB 1,116 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: T180226p SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 214 48 46 45 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 349 Write 306 Mixed 300 SusWrite 121 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 24.9 86% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 93.5 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 101 75% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1.5GB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2 of 3 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.99% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.57 GB/s	Latency 370 11% 370 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.99% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	487x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	460x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,369x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	490x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16