Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	10 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110406
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '21 at 00:27
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 166 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 328 44% 329 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Device(0000 0000) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 335.23 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 17.6 14% 17.3 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 15.9 Splatting 15.3 14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 326 328 330 329 332 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 331 Mixed 293 SusWrite 326 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 61.5 4K Mixed 33.3 120% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 256 219% 322 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 556GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 131 129 128 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 101 Write 83.8 Mixed 57.1 SusWrite 128 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 278GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 81 81 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 111 Write 101 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 81.7 71% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG V01D3LF4GB26826813 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 14GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.5% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16