HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory1.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110406
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 13:54
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 137
59% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 293
35% 270 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 17
Parallax 16.5
15% 17.2 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 154 199 212 192 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 345
Write 123
Mixed 156
SusWrite 206
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 17.2
58% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 165
138% 205 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
602GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 48 48 55 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 70
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 48.6
37% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 102 99 98 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 88
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 101
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
697GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 77 76 78 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 82.3
Write 52.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 76.7
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 83%
JMicron Tech 750GB
160GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.3 1 0.9 0.7 1.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Read 20
Write 16.3
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 1.1
17% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG V01D3LF4GB26826813 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback