Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20JH002TMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 29% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20JH002TMD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20JH002TMD
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200806
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 17:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 22%
CPU Throttled 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 151
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 231
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5061) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.3% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.4
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8
5% 5.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVKV512HAJH-000L1 512GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L0QBXX7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 552 665 527 810 787 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,008
Write 1,003
Mixed 592
SusWrite 625
181% 807 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 36.1
119% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 367
285% 394 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 134%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback