| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 03 '21 at 15:38 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | SVN-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
81.5%
Excellent
|
80% 140 Pts
|
65% 507 Pts
|
35% 563 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.8%
Below average
|
46% 54.3 fps
|
22% 31.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
34.1%
Below average
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
23% 7.97 GB/s
|
52% 76.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,813 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,303x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,143x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 136x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 566x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 310x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 267x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $281 |