Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7H57D-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJan 30 '21 at 01:58
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 182
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 345
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
MSI(1462 1542) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.8% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 4.1
9% 9.33 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 4.6
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.8%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ezlink P anzer IV-H 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 97 96 97 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.2% Above average
Read 323
Write 155
Mixed 185
SusWrite 96.9
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 29.1
96% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 91.8
75% 109 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
656GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46% Average
Read 78.2
Write 78.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 81.7
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
203GB free
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 73 76 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 96.8
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 74.9
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 14.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback