Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac20,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac20,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-AF89B6D9451A490B
Memory120.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 02:13
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10910
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 295
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1,057
99% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,845
114% 1,845 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Apple(106B 021B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.50.32.03
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 87.2
Reflection 101
Parallax 190
71% 126 fps
MRender 86.1
Gravity 103
Splatting 68.2
68% 85.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 86%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 957
Write 1,240
Mixed 897
231% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 21.9
83% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,207
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 506
457% 716 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 25.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 26.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac20,2 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Apple iMac20,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback