Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 18:08
Run Duration	403 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Memory 87.4 1-Core 156 2-Core 311 100% 185 Pts	4-Core 602 8-Core 1045 100% 824 Pts	64-Core 1,445 89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8708) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Lighting 163 Reflection 160 Parallax 177 133% 166 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 140 Splatting 123 121% 152 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 625GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1390 1156 1142 1142 1100 1103 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 2,515 Write 2,345 Mixed 1,736 SusWrite 1,172 435% 1,942 MB/s	4K Read 63.1 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 80.6 265% 89.6 MB/s	DQ Read 65.2 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 852 443% 370 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 108GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 299 300 300 299 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 445 Mixed 392 SusWrite 316 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 54.1 177% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 131 104% 143 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 429GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 452 452 452 323 320 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 444 Mixed 444 SusWrite 408 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 52.5 172% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 130 104% 142 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 129%
Sandisk Ultra II 500GB 3,299 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 189GB free Firmware: X41100WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 304 267 289 294 289 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 486 Write 344 Mixed 246 SusWrite 296 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 42.8 140% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 94.7 DQ Mixed 116 74% 82 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 109%
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 2TB 2,050 User benchmarks, average bench 418% 1.5TB free Firmware: RKT4P1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 770 2685 4266 4274 4216 4180 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	411% Outstanding	Read 2,015 Write 3,909 Mixed 2,493 SusWrite 3,399 673% 2,954 MB/s	4K Read 56.4 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 89.5 290% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 713 DQ Write 726 DQ Mixed 1014 681% 818 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 411% Great: 606%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 779GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1836 1868 1645 1516 1546 1542 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	295% Outstanding	Read 2,532 Write 1,848 Mixed 1,746 SusWrite 1,659 436% 1,946 MB/s	4K Read 66 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 83.8 280% 95.9 MB/s	DQ Read 66.9 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 92.5 77% 108 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 295% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 122 127 127 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 87.1 Write 112 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 124 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 4x16GB 861 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 44.2 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 44 111% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 29.4 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 45.9 98% 34.4 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 141%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,161x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	869x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	608x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	479x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	311x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,528

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16