Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '21 at 20:04
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 128 2-Core 255 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 661 72% 569 Pts	64-Core 666 41% 666 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D97) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Lighting 56.3 Reflection 58 Parallax 53.3 46% 55.9 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 50.9 Splatting 46.3 43% 53.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
256gb SSD 256GB 916 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 165 268 201 149 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 695 Write 594 Mixed 601 SusWrite 254 120% 536 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 46.8 219% 84.5 MB/s	DQ Read 754 DQ Write 524 DQ Mixed 438 381% 572 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 167%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB 1,103 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 32GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 14 6 7.2 7.2 7.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.02% Terrible	Read 23.1 Write 13.7 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 8.3 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 48% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.02% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB 4,421 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 12.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,185x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	684x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	212x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	207x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	206x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	247x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	152x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	87x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	116x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16