Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel SE7525GP2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Intel LHREF001
Motherboard	Intel SE7525GP2 (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060324
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '21 at 23:41
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GEO-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz 29 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Memory 36.5 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 49.6 24% 37.4 Pts	4-Core 47.8 8-Core 51.2 7% 49.5 Pts	64-Core 50.7 3% 50.7 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 342.00 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.5 Reflection 20.8 Parallax 17.3 16% 19.2 fps	MRender 23.1 Gravity 20.2 Splatting 16 16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 27GB free Firmware: ZM100-33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 32 32 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 44.3 Write 48.5 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 32.3 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 33%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 361GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 90 98 95 96 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 100 Write 88 Mixed 33 SusWrite 81.4 55% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.3 162% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 114%
HPT DISK 0_0 640GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 494GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 189 198 213 204 105 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	101% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 151 Mixed 66 SusWrite 173 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1 224% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.95% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 7.95% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback