HP hp workstation xw6200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP hp workstation xw6200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B8h
Memory2 GB free of 3.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 16:24
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 26.4
2-Core 47.8
32% 45.1 Pts
4-Core 50.3
8-Core 49.6
7% 49.9 Pts
64-Core 49.5
3% 49.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Diamond(1092 E990) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 36 29 34 31 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 46.9
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 30.6
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 33%
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85
92GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9.1 9.8 10 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 35GB
null MHz
512, 512, 1024, 1024, 33280 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw6200 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback