Asus M5A97

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 22:52
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 108
52% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 214
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB
CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 21.8
18% 21 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERT EX PLUS 240GB
10GB free
Firmware: 3.02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 237
Write 236
Mixed 153
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 13.2
65% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 47
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 14.3
17% 29.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 45%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 291 291 280 291 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 482
Write 416
Mixed 397
SusWrite 304
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 38
139% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 57.6
DQ Mixed 93.1
88% 144 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 124%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 130 135 129 129 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 144
Write 139
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 132
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 14.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $470
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback