Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 19:27
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 50
2-Core 147
54% 92 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 488
46% 384 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 59.3
47% 61 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 58.4
Splatting 51.9
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 190 199 197 196 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,221
Write 917
Mixed 922
SusWrite 266
185% 831 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 59.4
194% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 507
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 566
394% 493 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 146%
Great: 169%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
183GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 118 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 111
Write 96.3
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 117
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 69%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
29GB free, PID null, SanDisk 3.2Gen1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 71.8
Write 28.7
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 30.6
55% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.8
164% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.4% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 18.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback