Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_TUF565DV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DV_TUF565DV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200212
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 17:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 64
1-Core 114
2-Core 202
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 568
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 25.8
15% 46 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 14.3
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 14%
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 140F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.3% Good
Lighting 86.5
Reflection 94.9
Parallax 87.2
70% 89.5 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 81.5
Splatting 0.2
49% 69.6 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 108 57 56 35 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,258
Write 890
Mixed 843
SusWrite 103
172% 773 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 68.3
239% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 218
261% 440 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 155%
Great: 209%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
529GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 111 111 112 112 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 98.4
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 109
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD F4-2400C16-8GRS 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 18.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_TUF565DV Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_TUF565DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback