PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110729 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 11 '20 at 01:29 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
74.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 273 268 277 280 282 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 101 103 103 102 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
Inateck 1TB
619GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Passport 25EA 4TB
3TB free, PID 25ea
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 10x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 6x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $346 |