Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '21 at 03:15
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 313
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 914
95% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,150
71% 1,150 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Lighting 94.6
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 80.2
77% 86.1 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 80
Splatting 71.6
59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 248 226 219 215 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 305
Mixed 248
SusWrite 231
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 45.2
176% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 253
206% 295 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
WD My Passport 25EA 4TB
2TB free, PID 25ea
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 37.3
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 20.3
42% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
59% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
945GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 39
Write 38.5
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 24.4
43% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 28.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 31.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 4R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 18% 72 43 10 180 27" 1920 1080 SPT0ACD Sceptre M27
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 14,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $877
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback