Asrock H61M-HVS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 11:13
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 514
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 65.5
57% 69 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 72
Splatting 66.3
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 93 69 98 105 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 98.3
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 88.5
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 77%
Hdt722516dla380 41N3148LEN 160GB
124GB free
Firmware: V43OA9BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 56 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 58
Write 56.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 55.6
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
222GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 87 87 94 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 93.8
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 92.1
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1881ED58E9W1600 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HVS Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVS - $64

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback