Notebook N85_87HP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook N85_87HP6  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_87HP6
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 11:01
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 456
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8503) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 5.7
4% 27.7 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.1
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
599GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1845 1824 1403 1127 1132 1131 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,441
Write 2,182
Mixed 1,560
SusWrite 1,410
425% 1,898 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 79.4
261% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,070
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 914
688% 927 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 307%
Great: 372%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
295GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 95 95 94 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 61.5
Write 86.1
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 91
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 70%
LaCie Rugged USB-C 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 1093
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 140 138 141 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 136
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 139
157% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/16G 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 23.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_87HP6 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_87HP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback