PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7816 |
Motherboard | MSI B85-G43 (MS-7816) (all builds) |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130506 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 23 '20 at 11:22 |
Run Duration | 210 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 411.31
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB-$86
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 205 197 138 81 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
|||
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
181GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 218 137 142 143 145 MB/s
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
98GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 131 136 135 136 136 MB/s
|
76.4%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate BUP BL 4TB
1.5TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 10 17 8.3 68 40 MB/s
|
9.14%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
1GB free, PID ac25
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
||||
Seagate Portable 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2344
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 38 41 41 41 41 MB/s
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
5GB free, PID ac25
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 114 68 67 92 114 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.3%
Above average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 227x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 77x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 72x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 104x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 69x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 57x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $584 |