Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m7-6Y75 1,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 45.1 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 56.9 27% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 79.8 8-Core 85.3 11% 82.6 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake) 10,056 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	5.25% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 3.38 5% 4.19 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 11.7 6% 6.64 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.25% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk Ext SSD 240GB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 201 250 233 221 243 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.3% Below average	Read 254 Write 188 Mixed 233 SusWrite 232 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 8.2 41% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 21.9 DQ Mixed 11.6 11% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown (ce00) K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.2% Above average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 19.1 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.3 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16