Today's hottest deals

HP Elite x2 1012 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Elite x2 1012 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FC
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 01:19
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 73%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m5-6Y54
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 125
51% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 155
17% 136 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.9
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 8.2
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 300 313 314 323 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1,286
Write 876
Mixed 529
SusWrite 333
167% 756 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 26.3
96% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 221
157% 199 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 110%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron/Elpida 825630-692 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite x2 1012 G1 Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite x2 1012 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback