Packard imedia S1350

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard imedia S1350  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S1350
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100330
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 29 '17 at 17:46
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 57.2
33% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 61.4
8-Core 60.1
8% 60.8 Pts
64-Core 49.9
3% 49.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Acer(1025 0394) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDN 724030ALE640 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8O
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 164
Write 145
Mixed 153
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.23
108% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 86%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 38.7
Mixed 47.1
31% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.13
48% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 63%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
28GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 18.3
Mixed 16.7
25% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.63
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.73
68% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HU564403EP02 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S1350 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback