Today's hottest deals

Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200606
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 17:18
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 569
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 1858 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 38.1
33% 36.4 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 37.3
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU700 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B170428a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 39 36 25 48 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 454
Write 35.3
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 32.1
30% 143 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 19.2
81% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 80
DQ Write 66.4
DQ Mixed 28.4
34% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
619GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 37 36 33 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 142
Write 146
Mixed 85
SusWrite 32
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KBN26N19S8/4 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback