Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B360M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 12:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 759
80% 642 Pts
64-Core 767
48% 767 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 25.9
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 154 156 148 156 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 489
Write 154
Mixed 159
SusWrite 152
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 25.1
104% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 162
139% 210 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 136%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
887GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 121 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 122
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback