| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP 0944____ (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30E4 |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090914 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 14 '20 at 14:24 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD TurionX2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-82
Unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
|
39.8%
Below average
|
38% 55.3 Pts
|
8% 59.9 Pts
|
4% 64.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 3200
HP(103C 30E4) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.3000
|
0.55%
Terrible
|
0% 0.79 fps
|
1% 0.77 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBEOC44C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 52 47 58 55 60 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
38% 51.8 MB/s
|
115% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
Multi Flash Reader 64GB
14GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 12 11 12 MB/s
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
17% 12.8 MB/s
|
172% 2.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
|
21.2%
Poor
|
20% 7.1 GB/s
|
14% 4.73 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds