Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory51.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 11:28
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 560
59% 472 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 135
Parallax 133
114% 136 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 124
Splatting 101
104% 131 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 228 266 219 220 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,780
Write 472
Mixed 536
SusWrite 240
164% 757 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 46.1
186% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 1,174
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 438
388% 611 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 173%
Great: 283%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 279 225 199 195 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 474
Write 328
Mixed 377
SusWrite 221
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 36.8
133% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 177
184% 302 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 122%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
166GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 71 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 70.8
Write 78.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 69.8
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
159GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 102 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.2
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 101
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
359GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 94 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 81
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 93.9
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5 - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $612
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback