MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7998
MotherboardMSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '17 at 14:05
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 223
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 674
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 80
47% 67.8 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 55.3
Splatting 54.1
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 489
Write 264
Mixed 272
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 31.1
134% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 69.8
104% 201 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB-$105
385GB free
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 487
Write 196
Mixed 219
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 11.2
68% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 36.5
DQ Mixed 24.7
38% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST8000DM005-2EH1 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 104%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$72
8GB free, PID 1697
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 159
Write 84
Mixed 120
144% 121 MB/s
4K Read 4.65
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.59
63% 2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 04CD F4-2400C15-8GNT 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 04CD F4-2400C15-8GNT 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.2% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) Builds (Compare 1,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback