Today's hottest deals

RM ONE ECOQUIET 320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRM ONE ECOQUIET 320  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450S-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 338
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Nvidia(10DE 069A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 1.41
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 6.38
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.96
4% 4.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 80 62 54 58 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 228
Write 223
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 80.7
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 19.4
80% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 90.5
78% 119 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 82%
Toshiba MK3276GSX -63 320GB
228GB free
Firmware: GS101X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 83 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 82.2
Write 80.9
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 81.8
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE ECOQUIET 320 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: RM ONE ECOQUIET 320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback