Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 80.1 1-Core 146 2-Core 296 93% 174 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 827 80% 657 Pts	64-Core 962 60% 962 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% MSI(1462 8A9C) 1GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 17.1 16% 17.8 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 18.2 Splatting 17 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 16%
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3790) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.5% Good	Lighting 84.9 Reflection 83.4 Parallax 76.8 69% 81.7 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 73.2 Splatting 72.6 58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 480GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 59 58 49 40 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 378 Write 254 Mixed 227 SusWrite 53.2 50% 228 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 14.6 48% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 42.6 DQ Write 70.6 DQ Mixed 23.5 27% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 166%
Amd-raid Array 3 499GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 27GB free Firmware: 9.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,604 Write 1,720 Mixed 1,626 438% 1,984 MB/s	4K Read 50.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 66 215% 72.6 MB/s	DQ Read 511 DQ Write 1,329 DQ Mixed 795 642% 878 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 288%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 50GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 109 112 97 106 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 124 Write 131 Mixed 94.5 SusWrite 106 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A5244CB0-CRC 28GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 34.7 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.5 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 31.4 74% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	167x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	155x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $169Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	105x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	97x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	70x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	49x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,770

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16