Intel S5000XVN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel S5000XVN  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '20 at 10:17
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5310
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 47.7
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 36.7
24% 34.3 Pts
4-Core 71.9
8-Core 146
13% 109 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SRCSASRB 255GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 118 117 111 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.1% Below average
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 126
SusWrite 118
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 18
59% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 93.5
71% 95.4 MB/s
Intel SRCSASRB 999GB
930GB free
Firmware: 1.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 180 179 168 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 173
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 178
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5000XVN Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S5000XVN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback