Today's hottest deals

Intel_ S5000XVN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL_ S5000XVN
MotherboardIntel_ S5000XVN  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 16:58
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5310
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 20.8
2-Core 42
29% 40.4 Pts
4-Core 84.1
8-Core 165
15% 125 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 71 55 73 69 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 78
Write 72.9
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 66.7
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 8 slots used
2GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5000XVN Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Intel_ S5000XVN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback