HP ENVY All-in-One 32-a0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY All-in-One 32-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C6
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200521
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 20:02
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$237
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 1,111
101% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 86C6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 94.5
Parallax 8.44
6% 36.6 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 15.7
8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel HBRPEKNX0203AH 1TB
747GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 999 1027 1050 939 911 781 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,230
Write 1,092
Mixed 851
SusWrite 951
232% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 66.7
220% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 626
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 460
392% 574 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 204%
Great: 230%
Lacie Rugged Mini USB3 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 132 131 132 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 97.4
Write 116
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 127
69% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 60 105 103 108 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 100
Write 38.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 92.3
86% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 42%
Generic MassStorageClass 256GB
234GB free, PID 0754
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 119 118 119 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 224
Write 110
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 117
162% 134 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
159% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 25.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 24.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY All-in-One 32-a0xxx Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY All-in-One 32-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback