Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '20 at 19:06
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 199
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 330
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 80 77 81 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 392
Write 98.5
Mixed 164
SusWrite 78.6
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 37
139% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 169
139% 207 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 124%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
13GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 360
Mixed 26
59% 270 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 16
76% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 1.1
67% 154 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
WD WD60EJRX-89MP9Y1 6TB
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 77 76 80 84 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46% Average
Read 81
Write 101
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 79.2
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
56GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 41 49 39 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 29.3
Write 139
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 44.3
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 90%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
118GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 41 48 39 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 64
Write 86.3
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 44.4
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 105%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
45GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 60 63 62 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 58.5
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 60.6
73% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 17.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $384
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback