Supermicro X9DR3-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DR3-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DR3-F
Memory88.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 30 '21 at 17:04
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 167
53% 99 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 649
58% 490 Pts
64-Core 1,664
103% 1,664 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2572
Write 2,654
Mixed 2,501
576% 2,576 MB/s
4K Read 131
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 110
392% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 738
543% 713 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
0GB free
Firmware: 61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 426 134 144 200 4.6 MB/s
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.9% Good
Read 151
Write 68.5
Mixed 145
SusWrite 210
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 30
108% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 209
154% 200 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 102%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
0GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 177 181 177 182 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 189
Mixed 128
SusWrite 178
126% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
263% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C Samsung M393B1K70QB0- HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT31GR7BFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT31GR7BFR4C Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Se... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 22
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DR3-F Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X9DR3-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback