Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 02:31
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 46
1-Core 131
2-Core 265
75% 147 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 742
74% 603 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 96
Parallax 111
83% 103 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 83.9
87% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 240GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 186 113 104 115 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 361
Write 286
Mixed 297
SusWrite 157
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 15.3
73% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 32.6
59% 116 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 91%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
90GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,429
Write 1,591
Mixed 1,156
311% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 40.5
129% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 760
586% 809 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
55GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 120 103 93 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 106
Write 98.3
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 111
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback