Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory32.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 02:31
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU-A (00), 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 139
56% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 402
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 92.2
58% 78.3 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 59
53% 66 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 216 215 218 215 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.7% Average
Read 228
Write 227
Mixed 214
SusWrite 208
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 15.6
52% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 144
122% 178 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 91%
Samsung MZ7LM1T9HCJM-00003 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: GXT3003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 238 238 241 238 233 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60% Above average
Read 252
Write 239
Mixed 212
SusWrite 235
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 26
91% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 151
116% 160 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 60%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5x8GB
5 of 8 slots used
40GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback