Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20ERS00900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20ERS00900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ERS00900
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 13:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 181
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 502
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M3000M
Legend(17AA 222F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 354.74
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 30.7
27% 32.9 fps
MRender 44
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 45
33% 39.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000 256GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 94 95 86 73 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46% Average
Read 328
Write 121
Mixed 159
SusWrite 85.1
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 8.3
68% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 157
125% 176 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
57GB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 37 44 41 44 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 4.8
Write 40.3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 40.4
16% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 13%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback