Today's hottest deals

HP Elite x2 1012 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Elite x2 1012 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FC
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 08:54
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m5-6Y57
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 126
48% 82 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 77.4
20% 131 Pts
64-Core 71.5
4% 71.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80FC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.81
2% 2.58 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 4.48
3% 3.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 173 150 134 151 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 303
Write 174
Mixed 164
SusWrite 147
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 11.2
54% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 128
115% 174 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron/Elpida 825630-691 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite x2 1012 G1 Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite x2 1012 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback