Asus Z170-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150703
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 03:17
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 249
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 712
69% 566 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 30% Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9266
Write 6,605
Mixed 7452
1,727% 7,774 MB/s
4K Read 656
4K Write 489
4K Mixed 63.1
1,334% 403 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 1,079
DQ Mixed 1,149
833% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1TB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 103 104 104 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 97.8
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 103
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
950GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 142 145 146 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 153
Mixed 113
SusWrite 144
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
289GB free
Firmware: 1113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 92 96 96 96 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 85.4
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 91.4
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 62%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 36.9
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 21.1
42% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 60%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
510GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 35.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 20.9
39% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 24
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z170-DELUXE - $319

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,062
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback