Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20347

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20347  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y40-70
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 21:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 157
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 220
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.12027.1001
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 13
Parallax 18.9
4% 12.3 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 12.2
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$42
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 390 393 399 384 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 406
Write 418
Mixed 301
SusWrite 394
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 34.8
121% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 154
130% 185 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20347 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20347

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback