Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-220
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 14:13
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 111
45% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 184
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 235
Sapphire(174B D145) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 2.53
2% 2.69 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 2.35
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 107 104 56 65 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 114
Mixed 64
SusWrite 80.4
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.9
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.7
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback