bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DG41TX
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 15:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 55.2
36% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 111
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset
Intel(8086 D620)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.58
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.62 fps
MRender 0.52
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.87
0% 0.62 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 219 200 222 223 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.9% Above average
Read 238
Write 225
Mixed 214
SusWrite 214
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 34.1
111% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39.4
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 49
40% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
806GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 125
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 124
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.8
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback