Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory52.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 01:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4650 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 144
58% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 560
50% 422 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3001) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 53.7
35% 41.7 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 44.2
Splatting 35.5
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 76 76 80 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 417
Write 82.5
Mixed 111
SusWrite 76.9
37% 172 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 21.5
80% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 110
87% 123 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 121%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 145 145 144 147 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 188
Write 152
Mixed 72
SusWrite 146
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.6
7% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.6% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 14.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback