HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8392
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170929
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 15 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 208
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 387
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8392) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 24.3
8% 15.4 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 22.1
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 12%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,509
Write 739
Mixed 523
202% 924 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 60.1
235% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 877
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 700
554% 772 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
692GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 126 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 127
Write 114
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 127
71% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback