Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '20 at 18:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 99
2-Core 221
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 432
57% 430 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2977) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1547 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 69.5
55% 70.6 fps
MRender 77.8
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 59.2
54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SQF-S25M8-128G-SAC 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 188 187 187 188 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 430
Write 190
Mixed 213
SusWrite 182
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 34.8
136% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 133
136% 226 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 21.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback