HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 20:08
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800B APU
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 148
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 223
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8490
HP(103C 90B8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 84 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 81.3
Write 81.9
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 84.5
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
117GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 117 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 117
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
K 9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 MT Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback