Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC8i7HVB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i7HVK
MotherboardIntel NUC8i7HVB  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '20 at 11:45
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8809G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 249
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 740
71% 586 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Intel(8086 2073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20.01.12
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 36% Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2391 2560 2594 2443 2335 2381 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 1,611
Write 2,506
Mixed 1,677
SusWrite 2,451
468% 2,061 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 84.6
285% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,111
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 1,020
762% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 348%
Great: 491%
TCSUNBOW P1 1TB
160GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 339 337 341 340 336 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 366
Write 339
Mixed 303
SusWrite 340
456% 337 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 18.2
3,256% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 20
4,273% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 363%
Great: 363%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 60.1
66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8i7HVB Builds (Compare 745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel NUC8i7HVB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback