Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8809G 3,729 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 189 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 523 50% 414 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 89%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 892GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1865 1853 1954 1970 1837 1879 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	285% Outstanding	Read 1,520 Write 1,658 Mixed 1,459 SusWrite 1893 369% 1,632 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 68.5 219% 75.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,128 DQ Write 676 DQ Mixed 726 588% 843 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 285% Great: 365%
USB Disk 2.0 64GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 27GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 1.4 6.7 8.1 0.1 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 19.4 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 6.7 22% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.2 55% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB 3,102 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	82% Excellent	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 26.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 23.5 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

CPU
Core i7-8809GIntelBench 80%, 3,729 samples	728x

GPU
Radeon RX Vega M GHAMDBench 38%, 3,270 samples	634x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	7x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	40x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	36x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GBKingstonBench 80%, 5,417 samples	40x
Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX4M2A2400C16 2x31.5GBCorsairBench 75%, 54 samples	22x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 5,229 samples	21x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $170