MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive378% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 07:47
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$493
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 163
2-Core 312
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,214
107% 909 Pts
64-Core 2,964
184% 2,964 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 46.9
Reflection 237
Parallax 241
38% 175 fps
MRender 288
Gravity 243
Splatting 148
177% 226 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 6 999GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4571 4596 2798 976 971 974 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
378% Outstanding
Read 2,690
Write 4,614
Mixed 2,020
SusWrite 2481
668% 2,951 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 64.2
232% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 1,026
783% 1,053 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 378%
Great: 378%
Amd-raid Force MP600 1TB
592GB free
Firmware: EGFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3095 3103 3077 3119 3176 3157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 1632
Write 2,239
Mixed 1,662
SusWrite 3,121
492% 2,164 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 72.4
253% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 1,146
DQ Mixed 1,106
795% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 377%
Great: 413%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 1TB
581GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 409 407 407 409 414 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 464
Write 404
Mixed 411
SusWrite 410
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 35.9
122% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 128
102% 140 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 95%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 166 170 172 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 32
SusWrite 169
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 46.3
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 39.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 125%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback